The CID (Crime) in Ahmedabad has registered a financial fraud complaint involving over ₹1.56 crore linked to a commercial investment scheme in WTC GIFT City Tower-C. Investors allege they were lured with promises of a 1% monthly return, a 12% bonus, and a 2-year buyback guarantee that were never honored. While initial payments were made to establish trust, the scheme collapsed in late 2022, leaving victims with dishonored cheques and an unreturned principal amount exceeding ₹1.27 crore.
The alleged fraud involves a specific investment opportunity in WTC GIFT City Tower-C that targeted high-net-worth individuals in 2021. Investors were told that purchasing commercial units would yield a 1% monthly return on their investment. To further entice buyers, the developers offered a buyback option after 24 months along with a 12% guaranteed bonus.
To secure these investments, the company issued official booking letters and post-dated cheques (PDCs) as collateral for the principal and the promised bonus. Trusting the professional setting of a GIFT City corporate office and the use of bank-to-bank transfers, three investors collectively moved ₹1.56 crore into accounts linked to the project.
The scheme reportedly followed a classic “trust-building” phase where investors received regular monthly returns for approximately one year. However, payments abruptly ceased after September 2022. When the investors attempted to exercise their buyback option and deposit the security cheques for their principal and 12% bonus, the cheques were dishonored (bounced) by the bank.
Investigators found that out of the total investment, a significant portion—more than ₹1.27 crore—was never returned to the victims. This led to the formal complaint with the CID (Crime), which is now examining whether the funds were diverted or siphoned into unrelated accounts.
| Financial Detail | Statutory Data |
| Total Complaint Amount | ₹1.56 Crore |
| Alleged Unreturned Amount | ₹1.27 Crore+ |
| Target Project | WTC GIFT City Tower-C |
| Promised Monthly Return | 1% (12% Annually) |
| Exit Clause | 2-Year Buyback + 12% Bonus |
| Investigating Agency | CID (Crime) Ahmedabad |
Investors should be wary of any real estate scheme that offers fixed monthly percentages (like 1% per month) that significantly exceed standard market rental yields (typically 3–5% annually). Under the Banning of Unregulated Deposit Schemes (BUDS) Act, many such “assured return” models are now illegal unless they follow strict SEBI or RERA guidelines.
The CID (Crime) is currently in the process of identifying all company representatives and intermediaries involved in the 2021 meetings. They are scrutinizing the bank accounts that received the ₹1.56 crore to see if the money was used for construction at WTC Tower-C or moved elsewhere.
If the investigation reveals that the developer or intermediary had no intention of honoring the buyback or the monthly returns from the start, the case will proceed under sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) related to criminal breach of trust and cheating.
The investigation into the ₹1.56 crore WTC GIFT City fraud serves as a stark reminder for investors to perform deep due diligence, even in prestigious zones like GIFT City. While the project site and corporate office provided a veneer of security, the reliance on post-dated cheques and “assured” returns ultimately led to significant financial loss. As the CID (Crime) deepens its probe into the Tower-C accounts, the case highlights the urgent need for investors to prioritize RERA-registered sale deeds over high-interest promises.
Disclaimer: This article is based on publicly available information and a formal CID (Crime) complaint regarding alleged fraud at WTC GIFT City Tower-C. All details are under investigation; parties are presumed innocent until proven guilty. This is not financial advice; verify all RERA documents independently.
Subscribe now and be the first to receive insights that matter.





























.webp?w=768)
.webp?w=768)
.webp?w=768)
.webp?w=768)
.webp?w=768)
.webp?w=768)
.webp?w=768)
.webp?w=768)
-(1).webp?w=768)
.webp?w=768)
.webp?w=768)
.webp?w=768)
.webp?w=768)
.webp?w=768)
.webp?w=768)
.webp?w=768)
.webp?w=768)
.webp?w=768)
.webp?w=768)
.webp?w=768)
.webp?w=768)








































