If RERA fails to resolve a complaint within the statutory 60-day timeline, buyers are not left helpless. The law mandates that RERA must provide a written justification for delays. Buyers can push for expedited action, file appeals with the Real Estate Appellate Tribunal (REAT), or even approach the High Court if delays become unreasonable. Additionally, execution petitions and penalty provisions help ensure promoters comply with RERA orders. These remedies make the grievance redressal mechanism more accountable and transparent.
RERA mandates that complaints must be decided within 60 days to ensure buyers get speedy justice. This provision was included because property disputes historically dragged on for years in consumer forums and civil courts. The deadline creates accountability and forces authorities to prioritize cases affecting homebuyers’ money and possession timelines.
If the 60-day deadline is breached, RERA must issue a written explanation for the delay. This written record helps buyers track accountability.
Steps for buyers in such cases:
Why it matters: This is the first line of remedy and creates a paper trail, useful if escalation becomes necessary.
Yes, buyers are encouraged to actively follow up with the authority. While RERA is mandated to act within timelines, administrative backlogs sometimes cause delays.
How Tax, GST, and RERA Changes Affected Rental Yields
Yes. Buyers can appeal before the Real Estate Appellate Tribunal (REAT). Even if no order is passed within 60 days, buyers can argue that the delay itself is grounds for appeal.
Appeal process:
Example: If a buyer’s possession delay complaint drags on for 8 months without a decision, they can appeal to REAT for directions.
Yes, the High Court can step in under writ jurisdiction. This is typically invoked when:
Judicial precedent: High Courts have recognized that indefinite delay defeats the purpose of RERA. Buyers can seek a mandamus (order) to force RERA to decide within a fixed timeline.
Once RERA issues an order for refund, compensation, or possession, but the promoter refuses to comply, buyers can file an execution petition.
Yes, RERA has the power to penalize promoters for causing or prolonging disputes.
| State RERA Authority | Avg. Resolution Time | % Resolved Within 60 Days | Pending Complaints |
|---|---|---|---|
| MahaRERA (Maharashtra) | 70 days | 62% | 18,500 |
| UP RERA | 85 days | 55% | 12,300 |
| Gujarat RERA | 60 days | 70% | 6,400 |
| Delhi RERA | 95 days | 48% | 4,100 |
Insight: While some states meet timelines more effectively than others, backlogs persist as a challenge. Buyers must use available remedies for faster relief.
| Remedy | Who Can Use It? | Timeline | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| Written Justification | All buyers | Immediate | Explains delay |
| Follow up with RERA | Active buyers | Anytime | Expedited disposal |
| Appeal to REAT | Buyers are dissatisfied with the delay | Within 60 days of the delay/order | Tribunal directions |
| High Court Writ | Buyers facing unreasonable delay | Anytime | Judicial intervention |
| Execution Petition | Buyers with a favorable RERA order | Post-order | Enforced compliance |
| Penalties on Promoter | Ordered by RERA | Case-specific | Monetary fines |
The 60-day deadline under RERA is meant to protect buyers from prolonged disputes. While authorities sometimes miss this deadline, multiple remedies, ranging from written justifications to High Court writs, ensure buyers are not left without options. Execution petitions and penalties further enhance accountability, making promoters comply with orders.
Subscribe now and be the first to receive insights that matter.